Sample Projects: Legal and Litigation Intelligence

SIG discovered that several employees had each stolen elements of a patented chemical product.  Together they reproduced a similar product, and were selling it competitively in another city.  SIG was able to substantiate theft of trade secrets, identify the perpetrators, document their sale of product, and obtain and analyze a sample of the product.  As a result counsel was for the client company was able to initiate legal action against the perpetrators and protect its client’s intellectual property.

Contracts of counsel’s client for cable trenching with a major telecom company were being canceled and awarded to a competitor without obvious cause.  After following the trail through three degrees of separation and several U.S. states, SIG discovered that the executive in charge of awarding the contracts at the telecom was a silent partner of the competitor. SIG analysis and documentation of an extremely complex set of interrelationships was presented to the telecom by counsel, resulting in a multi-million dollar settlement in favor of the client.

A defendant claimed he had no assets except a homestead in his state of residence and a “worthless” piece of property in another state. SIG discovered that the property the defendant had claimed to be worthless (due to its being entirely encircled by another property), in fact had mineral rights of potentially substantial value.  

SIG also found an undisclosed bank account, and documented property passed on to the defendant’s daughter using a structure of interlocking trusts.  In reality this constituted a fraudulent scheme undertaken by the defendant in an attempt to render himself “judgment proof.”

On the basis of a review of billable hours, a major national marketing company received a demand for a steep discount on a multi-million dollar bill. Despite the fact that project payment was contracted on a fee—rather than hourly—basis, a non-traditional consulting company hired by the client tried, in violation of agreement, to adjust charges to a lower number. 

SIG discovered a relationship between a key executive of a competing service firm and a co-owner of the audit firm.  SIG further documented an unusual pattern of activity involving other companies hiring the auditor and then, based on the results of similar non-traditional audits, renegotiating contracts.  This provided a means for counsel to attack the validity of the audit and obtain the fees due per the original contract.

A large contracting company was sued by an individual who claimed a piece of equipment parked near a road blocked his view, causing a car wreck that resulted in the individual’s inability to work.  The case hinged on establishing whether the parked equipment was actually there: the plaintiff claimed it had been there “for weeks.”  Counsel’s client knew that the equipment had been moved prior to the date of the accident.  SIG found a satellite photo taken three days prior to the accident, with sufficient resolution to show that equipment was at that time no longer parked at the site as claimed.

Counsel’s client posed the question: “will the defendant fight to the end or settle?” SIG investigated the likely direction of pending litigation in this major lawsuit using pattern analysis of actions of the subject company (including previous litigation situations), situation analysis, and other elements.  SIG correctly predicted that the defendant would fight to the end.  The client could then use this information to its advantage in planning strategy for the case